|
search / subscribe / upload / contact |
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
| RSS-Feed Depeschen |  |
|
|
||
|
||
Date: 2001-05-06
ETSI, Interception und "journalistic interest"-.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- den Begehren der gesetzlich ermächtigten Behörden bezüglich CALEA [Communications Assistance Law Enforcement Act] umgegangen wird. Begehren hin, Begehren her, die Federal Communications Commission entscheidet und es wird öffentlich. Im guten alten Europa, wo man aufs Verschämteste im Geheimen, aber umso brutaler Abhör/standardisiert, erstellt man im ETSI interne Protokolle, wenn ruchbar wird, dass jemand recherchiert. Arbeitspapier 28wglitd011.doc für das ETSI "Lawful Interception" Treffen am 15. Mai in Hamburg trägt den Titel "On journalistic interest" zugänglich ist es freilich nicht. http://webapp.etsi.org/meetingDocuments/ViewDocumentList.asp?MTG_Id=21151 Hintergrund http://www.quintessenz.at/cgi-bin/htsearch?restrict=;exclude=;config=archiv;method=and;format=builtin-short;sort=time;words=ETSI;page=1 -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- [Federal Register: May 4, 2001 (Volume 66, Number 87)] [Rules and Regulations] [Page 22446-22448] From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov] [DOCID:fr04my01-11] -FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 47 CFR Part 64 [CC Docket No. 97-213; FCC 01-126] Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission. ACTION: Final rule; petitions for reconsideration. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: In this document the Commission responds to petitions for reconsideration of previous Commission decisions in this proceeding which implements the Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act (CALEA). The Commission makes minor revisions to the Commission's rules to clarify the arrangements telecommunications carriers subject to CALEA must make to ensure that law enforcement agencies can contact them when necessary, and to clarify the interception activity that triggers a record keeping requirement. The Commission makes additional clarifications without altering the rules, but otherwise denies the requests for reconsideration. DATES: Effective June 4, 2001. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Spencer or Susan Kimmel, 202-418- 1310. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's Second Order on Reconsideration (Second Order) in CC Docket No. 97-213; FCC 01-126, adopted April 9, 2001, and released April 16, 2001. The complete text of this Second Order is available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in the FCC Reference Information Center, Courtyard Level, 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC, and also may be purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Services (ITS, Inc.), CY-B400, 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC. Synopsis of the Second Order on Reconsideration 1. This Second Order on Reconsideration (Second Order) resolves two petitions for reconsideration of the Report and Order (R&O) in this proceeding (64 FR 51462, September 23, 1999) and one petition for reconsideration of the Second Report and Order (Second R&O) in this proceeding (64 FR 55164, October 12, 1999). These decisions implemented sections 102, 105, and 301 of the Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act (CALEA) (Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act, Public Law 104-414, 108 Stat. 4279, 1994.) The Second Order makes minor revisions to 47 CFR 64.2103 and 64.2104 to clarify the arrangements telecommunications carriers subject to CALEA must make to ensure that law enforcement agencies can contact them when necessary, and the interception activity that triggers a record keeping requirement. The Second Order makes additional clarifications without altering the Commission's rules, but otherwise denies the requests for reconsideration. 2. The U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) seek stronger personnel security measures than those adopted in the First R&O, in order to ``ensure the trustworthiness of the private-company employees who have become increasingly responsible for implementing electronic surveillance.'' As discussed in paragraphs 4 through 14 of the Second Order, the Commission denies the FBI's request. However, the Commission encourages carriers to consider voluntarily adopting, as internal procedures, measures to respond to the concerns presented by the FBI, as appropriate, and making them part of their systems security and integrity (SSI) policies and procedures. http://cryptome.org/fcc050401.txt -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- - -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- edited by Harkank published on: 2001-05-06 comments to office@quintessenz.at subscribe Newsletter - -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- 
|
|
|
 |
related topiqs |
 |
CURRENTLY RUNNING |
q/Talk 1.Juli: The Danger of Software Users Don't Control
|
|
|
!WATCH OUT! |
bits4free 14.Juli 2011: OpenStreetMap Erfinder Steve Coast live in Wien
|
|