|  | <<  
             ^ 
              >> 
            
              | Date: 2001-08-26 
 
 cu_spook3: Antwort an das Home Office-.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.-
 
 Das war die Antwort auf den zur Mail geronnenen Wutanfall eines
 Bürokraten aus dem britischen Innenministerium, der in den
 einschlägigen ETSI-Arbeitsgruppen mindestens seit 1997 sein
 Wesen treibt.
 
 Tipp: Je weiter man hinunterkommt, desto lustiger wirds.
 
 Ob es den in diesem Mail/wechsel öfter erwähnten "Theo Metzger"
 beim deutschen Telekom-Regulationsbüro wirklich gibt, wird in
 einer der nexten q/depeschen zu lesen sein.
 
 Vorgeschichte I
 http://www.quintessenz.at/archiv/msg01588.html
 
 Vorgeschichte II
 http://www.quintessenz.at/archiv/msg01589.html
 
 bzw.http://www.quintessenz.at/archiv/msg01590.html
 
 [Hier hat sich ein kleiner Fehler im Online-Tool eingeschlichen, der
 am Wochenende nicht korrigierbar war und hoffentlich bald
 msg01589 und msg 01590 wieder vereint]
 -.-. --.-  -.-. --.-  -.-. --.-  -.-. --.-  -.-. --.-  -.-. --.-
 From: 	Erich M <me@erich-moechel.com> To: 	R R Thorogood
 <106154.2246@compuserve.com> Subject: 	Re: LSE Forum on
 Surveillance by Design Date sent: 	Wed, 11 Oct 2000 20:18:20
 +0200
 
 On 11 Oct 00, at 9:07, R R Thorogood added to the bitstream:
 
 > Was it Gus Hosein who said at the start of his presentation
 "there are > three rules of presentations" ? > > I believe there are
 four - the first of which is "read the delegate > list". > > You were
 obviously not aware that in the audience there were three members
 > of the ETSI Lawful Interception drafting group and one member of
 the > ILETS/PCWG group.
 
 Dear Mr. Thorogood,
 
 May assure you that I knew that you were there with your
 colleagues Tom Johnston et al from ETSI Workgroup "Lawful
 Interception" whilst you represented the Police Coordination
 Working Group and the International Law Enforcement Telecom
 Seminars [ILETS] without saying it publicly.
 
 > We saw the ETSI document on the screen in which you quoted
 the HI1 as > being the access point for the law enforcement
 authorities (plural).You > construed this as being the LEAs world
 wide. This is not what it says. It > is the LEAs in country.
 
 The so called "International User Requirements" in Version ETSI
 ETR 331 December 1996, Page 7, say: "This ETSI Technical
 Report ... provides a set of requirements relating to handover
 interfaces for the interception by law enforcement and state
 security agencies". "State security agencies", Mr Thorogood, not
 only police, as all this talk about "lawfulness" and only police being
 involved always suggests: That was the point of my speech.
 
 It is in a publicly available document on the ETSI server. There
 must have been quite a few downloads from destinations worldwide
 of this very document since I detected that [and numerous other]
 infamous passages pretty early this year. So there would be no
 use erasing that now.
 
 All interception interfaces described in the ETSI SEC Workgroup
 Lawful Interception documents are multi user interfaces.
 
 I am sure that you are aware of the mutual legal assistance treaty
 EU member states signed May 29 2000. It is yet unpublished but I
 am sure that you are as well in possession of document COPEN
 32 [last draft]. This treaty regulates interception matters across
 European borders, so foreign LEAs [and certain agencies] will be
 enabled to get access to interception interfaces in all kind of
 routing and switching equipment.
 
 > The IUR has always included the requirement for location
 information.
 
 It was the IUR from 1996 I showed. The IUR Versions before ETSI
 ETR 331, Dec 1996 did not include location explicitly. > > My
 colleague Theo Metzger if definitely a member of RegTP - he has
 phone, > fax and e-mails addresses there and I have been in his
 office. Suggest you > visit Mainz and check.
 
 This is great news, I think Mr. Metzger should inform also the staff
 at the telefone switch boards of the German Telecom Regulation
 Offices in Mainz and Saarbruecken of his existence. They did not
 know a person of this name whenm I called them in July. I would
 appreciate very much if you could hand me over his extension so I
 could ask him for a statement I really could need for the publication
 of my dossier.
 
 I could do that as well during the ETSI SEC Lawful Interception
 Working Group meeting on November 22 in Mainz, if I should be
 invited to participate.
 
 BTW: I tried to contact you without success on a UK fone number
 0044207.....64 [As this e-mail goes unprotected I erase some of
 the numbers] I found in another ETSI document. Is this outdated,
 maybe?
 
 > Hope this helps.
 
 I do hope so as well.
 
 Yours sincerely I remain
 Erich Moechel
 
 
 -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.-
 - -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.-
 edited by Harkank
 published on: 2001-08-26
 comments to office@quintessenz.at
 subscribe Newsletter
 - -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.-
 <<  
                   ^ 
                    >>
 |  |  |  |